https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30844
--- Comment #4 from Nelson Chu <nelsonc1225 at sourceware dot org> --- > The --emit-relocs should switch to preserve the original > relocation type, including R_RISCV_CALL_PLT(etc), > R_RISCV_RELAX, and R_RISCV_ALIGN. Looks reasonable, so based on this rule when setting --emit-reloc, 1. R_RISCV_CALL_PLT auipc, [R_RISCV_CALL_PLT][R_RISCV_RELAX] jalr (relax and emit to) -> jal, [R_RISCV_CALL_PLT][R_RISCV_RELAX] 2. R_RISCV_ALIGN .align 3, 6 nops under rvc, [R_RISCV_ALIGN] with addend 6 -> less then 6 nops (may be 0), [R_RISCV_ALIGN] with addend 6 or less? 3. R_RISCV_HI20/LO12 Even not all people like gp relaxation, we still need a rule in GNU ld for --emit-reloc. lui, [R_RISCV_HI20][R_RISCV_RELAX] addi, [R_RISCV_LO12][R_RISCV_RELAX] -> add with gp, [R_RISCV_HI20][R_RISCV_RELAX][R_RISCV_LO12][R_RISCV_RELAX], four relocs point to same instruction? 4, R_RISCV_PCREL_HI20/PCREL_LO12 Likewise, all the four relocs point to the same pcrel_lo instruction. 5. R_RISCV_GOT_HI20/PCREL_LO12 Likewise. 6. ... future relaxations, TLS, ... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
