https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31250
Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC| |nickc at redhat dot com Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed| |2024-01-25 --- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> --- Hi Amyspark, Is the library really valid if it contains absolute pathnames ? Ie, wouldn't it be better to fix how Rust is creating the library, rather than allowing strip to process it, only to have it rejected later on because of the paths ? The problem - from strip's point of view - is that it works by copying the members of the archive from the input archive into a temporary output archive, stripping them on the way. Once that is complete, it can delete the original and rename the temporary archive. This is hard to do if absolute paths are involved. Anyway, please could you try out the uploaded patch and let me know if it works for you ? My big worry with this patch is that it changes the path of absolute elements, so that the output archive is going to contain different paths to the input archive. but maybe this will not matter... Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.