https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32403

--- Comment #10 from Sourceware Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Haochen Jiang <jian...@sourceware.org>:

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=4c0a6e603743ca0c85f9ceb9913d646f0c961986

commit 4c0a6e603743ca0c85f9ceb9913d646f0c961986
Author: H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon Dec 2 12:58:33 2024 +0800

    x86: Eliminate unnecessary {evex} prefixes

    For several instructions including vps{l,r}l{d,q,w,dq} and vpsra{d,w},
    their VEX part do not have the following version:

            vpsrlw $0x1f,(%r15,%rcx,4),%xmm0

    Thus, {evex} prefix should not be inserted when their second operand is
    memory, while we still need them for register as second operand. Add a
    new macro %ME to solve this problem.

    For vpsraq, there is no VEX version, so the {evex} prefix should always
    be eliminated.

    gas/ChangeLog:

            PR binutils/32403
            * testsuite/gas/i386/i386.exp: Run new test.
            * testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64.exp: Ditto.
            * testsuite/gas/i386/evex-only.d: New test.
            * testsuite/gas/i386/evex-only.s: Ditto.
            * testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64-evex-only.d: Ditto.
            * testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64-evex-only.s: Ditto.

    opcodes/ChangeLog:

            PR binutils/32403
            * i386-dis-evex-reg.h: Use %ME instead of %XE for vps{l,r}l{w,dq}
            and vpsraw. Split table for vpsra{d,q}.
            * i386-dis-evex-w.h: Use %ME instead of %XE for vps{l,r}l{d,q}
            and vpsrad. Eliminate vpsraq {evex} prefix.
            * i386-dis-evex.h: Split table for vpsra{d,q}.
            * i386-dis.c: (EVEX_W_0F72_R_4): New.
            (EVEX_W_0FE2): Ditto.
            (struct dis386): Add comment for %ME.
            (putop): Handle %ME.

    Co-authored-by: Haochen Jiang <haochen.ji...@intel.com>
    Signed-off-by: H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com>

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Reply via email to