https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21479
--- Comment #13 from Sam James <sam at gentoo dot org> ---
For the non-fat case, we get:
a.c
```
extern void foo1(void);
void foo2(void) { foo1(); }
void foo3(void) {}
```
b.c:
```
extern void foo2(void);
extern void foo3(void);
void foo1(void) { foo3(); }
int main(void) { foo2(); }
```
$ gcc -c -flto a.c
$ ar cr a.a a.o
$ gcc b.c a.a
$ strip -R .gnu.lto_* -R .gnu.debuglto_* -N __gnu_lto_v1 a.a
strip: stt1ROFT/a.o: plugin needed to handle lto object
Maybe the message could be nicer or omitted even (don't think it serves much of
a purpose, other than maybe informing people they're doing something stupid, as
the archive which is non-fat is now useless).
But this isn't a problem for me at all either. Current behaviour is fine.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
