https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33429
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Joseph Myers from comment #8) > Created attachment 16340 [details] > TLS ABI > > The ABI (attached) expects -mxtls to be used for LD and LE TLS access with a > TLS area too large for 16-bit offsets. > > My understanding is that the issue here isn't actually a large TLS area, but > undefined weak TLS symbols, for which the ABI says nothing about how they > are resolved. Since it says nothing, it would seem appropriate for the > linker to handle them (for affected TLS models) in a way that avoids > overflow (resolving relocations to an offset of 0, or something like that). This may require linker to rewrite instructions. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
