https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32816
--- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Alan Modra from comment #10) > Yes, I knew about the ld.so _start. It should not matter as normally > *crt1.o will supply _start and thus _start won't cause ld.so to be pulled > in. The testcase that failed linked Yebefore pr26580-a.o > (which defined _start). If the order was changed the testcase would pass > without removing _start from the library. Yes, the pr26580-b.s change looks reasonable. We should add a test for this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
