Jesse Kornblum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... > tolerated. Although the one-liner you demonstrated should work quite > nicely, it's a lot to type on a regular basis. I worry that having such > a long command introduces too much possibility for error.
Hi Jesse, In cases like that one, it's best to write a small script to encapsulate the sequence of commands. It's pretty hard to justify adding such functionality when there's a reasonable way to automate it. However, if you can find a few other people who say they'd like that functionality and make a good case for it, I'll reconsider. Jim _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
