Andrew Klyachkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> The following patch adds `-I' option to df. With this option df produces 
> output similar to BSD's `df -i' - block usage and inode usage at once.

A couple of dumb questions.  What does BSD's df -i output look like?
And would it make sense simply to modify coreutils to match BSD's
behavior, particularly if the BSD behavior is more useful?

(I presume that coreutils is mimicking BSD's old behavior here, and
BSD changed.)


_______________________________________________
Bug-coreutils mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils

Reply via email to