Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I also would favor (B). But we certainly need testsuite additions to >> ensure that we don't introduce future regressions against this decision. > > OK, it'll be harder to test (B), since that relies on the test suite > knowing what rename() does. But I guess we can work around that.
It shouldn't be hard. Just run a little perl snippet to determine what rename() does, and base the expected results on that. _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
