Jim Meyering wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) wrote: > >>Jim Meyering wrote: >> >>>The description of wc's --files0-from is nearly identical >>>to that of du. I've added an example: >>>... >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>+find . -name '*.[ch]' -print0 | ./wc -L --files=- | tail -n1 >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] example >> >>Here you are using the substring abbreviation --files for >>--files0-from. Which is fine. But what if someday the --files-from >>option is added? My preference would be to make the example be unique >>in that case too and to use at least --files0=- there. > > ... > > Good point. > I've spelled it out: > > * coreutils.texi (wc invocation): Spell out `--files0-from' in > the example. Suggestion from Bob Proulx.
s#./wc#wc# Pádraig. p.s. I sent this privately but Jim's private mail is not working for me again. _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
