Michael A Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is in relation to an old bug listed here. > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2005-10/msg00181.html > > I happened to be using an old copy of coreutils and noticed many of > the old options status -c, atime -u, access -u, use -u did not > work. The patch in the thread got rid of them but I had already > implemented the functionality. Attached to this e-mail is a patch to > add it back in, comments welcome. I was not sure exactly how the > translations of the docs updated but included my best stab at it in > there. If someone could point me to something that details the > development flow for the docs that would be appreciated.
Thanks for the contribution. It looks like you're proposing a new feature. If so, please describe it, and explain how it would be useful. _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
