Jim Meyering wrote: > Considering your arguments, I wonder if it's worthwhile to see > how many of those changes are in parts of the code where decreased > code size and fewer branches might make a difference. Or go one > better...
Here's list of size changes for reference: $ find -type f -perm +111 -printf "%f\n" | sort | > xargs size > logical.size $ git show a037e838 | patch -p2 -R $ make $ find -newer chcon.c -type f -perm +111 -printf "%f\n" | sort | > xargs size > bitwise.size $ join -j6 -o 0,1.1,2.1 bitwise.size logical.size | column -t filename text text [ 29026 29026 cat 37530 37434 chcon 48181 48181 chgrp 44920 44984 chmod 41217 41217 chown 46982 47046 cp 97798 97782 dd 45727 45711 df 57633 57697 dir 95685 95637 du 86464 86464 expand 20663 20647 expr 25536 25552 ginstall 88646 88646 id 22035 22035 ls 95685 95637 md5sum 27182 27198 mv 91160 91144 od 52127 52143 pathchk 18799 18831 pr 50974 51006 ptx 51030 51030 rm 46499 46499 sha1sum 30786 30802 sha224sum 36626 36642 sha256sum 36626 36642 sha384sum 91930 91962 sha512sum 91930 91962 sort 74379 74523 stty 52619 52283 tail 50009 49993 test 26014 26014 unexpand 21833 21737 vdir 95685 95637 wc 28847 28831 cheers, Pádraig.
