Jim Meyering wrote: > Daniel Borkmann wrote: >> I think it would rather fit into the coreutils than having it's own >> distribution package. What do you think? (Source attached) > ... > Thanks for the suggestion, but it seems better to > do that with some shell and perl:
regardless if it's written in C, shell+perl or any other language, it's still the same question IMHO: should it go into coreutils? +1 from me (for the C alternative, no deps to shell/perl etc.). Have a nice day, Berny
