Jim Meyering wrote: > Voelker, Bernhard wrote: >> Jim Meyering wrote: >>> Daniel Borkmann wrote: >>>> I think it would rather fit into the coreutils than having it's own >>>> distribution package. What do you think? (Source attached) >>> ... >>> Thanks for the suggestion, but it seems better to >>> do that with some shell and perl: >> regardless if it's written in C, shell+perl or any other language, >> it's still the same question IMHO: should it go into coreutils? >> >> +1 from me (for the C alternative, no deps to shell/perl etc.). > > Sorry, but this is a developer tool
Despite of the language such a util is written in, I was wondering if it's really only a developer tool? Aren't there enough programs out there that do not ever print their errors correctly? No question that this would be a bad style, but nevertheless, it isn't rarely. Regards, Daniel
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
