On 03/12/2010 08:15 PM, Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote: > Should coreutils docs mention tempfile(1), > which is AFAICT not in coreutils? > > Is there a coreutils-only way to effect "tempfile -m 0600"?
Seems like it might be a reasonable thing to add to mktemp(1). But mktemp already generates 0600 by default. > > This came up in the context of studying: > <http://git.debian.org/?p=users/rfrancoise/rcs.git;a=blob;f=debian/patches/0004-Security-fixes.patch;h=cb7347d626e1a4593ac492066953988c81659119;hb=ac72d03ca695649ad311a295246595ab0e5e489e> > > for integration into GNU RCS. It seems that tempfile(1) is Debian-specific. What does tempfile(1) do that mktemp(1) does not? -- Eric Blake [email protected] +1-801-349-2682 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
