() Eric Blake <[email protected]> () Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:51:59 -0700 Seems like it might be a reasonable thing to add to mktemp(1). But mktemp already generates 0600 by default.
That's fine as it is, then. No change needed. What does tempfile(1) do that mktemp(1) does not? Not sure. Anyway, i will be using mktemp in rcsfreeze.sh. Thanks for the pointer. To close, attached is a (tiny change) doc patch that likewise uses mktemp. thi ________________________________
>From 348f1b15016496f134c79736930d4da299412fc5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 05:34:15 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] doc: Use coreutils program in shred(1) example. * doc/coreutils.texi (shred invocation): Use mktemp(1) instead of Debian-specific tempfile(1). Signed-off-by: Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> --- doc/coreutils.texi | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/coreutils.texi b/doc/coreutils.texi index 3e7a698..34ccf5a 100644 --- a/doc/coreutils.texi +++ b/doc/coreutils.texi @@ -8718,7 +8718,7 @@ The intended use of this is to shred a removed temporary file. For example: @example -i=`tempfile -m 0600` +i=`mktemp` exec 3<>"$i" rm -- "$i" echo "Hello, world" >&3 -- 1.6.3.2
