On 12/13/11 08:46, Kamil Dudka wrote: > If I understand it correctly, the > old behavior was violating POSIX whereas the current default behavior is > correct. I tried du --count-links with the original reproducer and it seemed > to work fine. So what would be the point in adding a new option?
Hey, I like that answer! Less work. Though arguably POSIX is incorrect here, as it seems to prohibit common behavior in most other 'du's.
