in Coreutils 8.21.1.1 (x86_64) on snoozy When I type in ls -k, I get a small listing (filenames only horizontally) (and no sizes). When I type in ls -lk, I get a long listing -- but it isn't using K, but bytes.
:-(. Why k no worky? I'd think: 1) ls -k should display the file size in k as ls -s display blocks. 2) ls -sk would display allocated size in k (which it may do?) and 3)ls -l would display sizes in k. Am I missing something about why 'k' doesn't work in 1 & 3? Actually ls -s acts like ls -sk -- doesn't display blocks but -k- Isn't a block 512B?
