On 06/01/2013 09:20 AM, Linda A. Walsh wrote: > What replaced it? > > I mean it doesn't do something *different*, it just ignores it.
I'm not sure what behavior you're asking for, but if you want the old behavior of -k, you can use the --block-size=1KiB option. So no functionality was lost. -k (and --block-size=1KiB) affects only the block size of displayed values; it doesn't affect the choice of which values to display.
