On Jun 2, 2014 6:46 PM, "Paul Eggert" <[email protected]> wrote: > > [Forwarding this to Bug#17669 as bug-coreutils seems to have misfiled it under 17664; closing 17664.] > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: Solaris acl woes > Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 06:56:03 -0700 > From: Paul Eggert <[email protected]> > Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department > To: Ben Walton <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected] > > > > Ben Walton wrote: > >> The lib/file-has-acl.c:acl_ace_nontrivial code that returns 1 is: > > > Why is it returning 1, exactly? What are the value of access_masks[0, > 1] and how do they compare to the masks, and what bits are set that > shouldn't be if we want the ACLs to be trivial?
I didn't get back to this yesterday but will tonight. What do you think about the fact that the Solaris tools seem to exhibit the same behavior? Thanks -Ben
