On 06/03/2014 07:51 AM, Ben Walton wrote: > On Jun 2, 2014 6:46 PM, "Paul Eggert" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> [Forwarding this to Bug#17669 as bug-coreutils seems to have misfiled it > under 17664; closing 17664.] >> >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: Re: Solaris acl woes >> Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 06:56:03 -0700 >> From: Paul Eggert <[email protected]> >> Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department >> To: Ben Walton <[email protected]>, [email protected], > [email protected] >> >> >> >> Ben Walton wrote: >> >>> The lib/file-has-acl.c:acl_ace_nontrivial code that returns 1 is: >> >> >> Why is it returning 1, exactly? What are the value of access_masks[0, >> 1] and how do they compare to the masks, and what bits are set that >> shouldn't be if we want the ACLs to be trivial? > > I didn't get back to this yesterday but will tonight. > > What do you think about the fact that the Solaris tools seem to exhibit the > same behavior?
I'd probably adjust the tests to first: getfacl test.acl | setfacl -f - test.acl || skip_ "system is unable to copy ACLs" thanks, Pádraig
