On 2025-11-03 10:04, Phillip Lougher wrote:

I implemented it in September, and it is in the upstream kernel

Thanks for letting us know. I installed the attached commentary fix to coreutils and am closing this coreutils bug report.
From c9425336f4fcaa11b9113a6cedce5a6609b726db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Eggert <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2025 11:33:38 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] doc: squashfs issue to be squashed in Linux 6.18

---
 NEWS                 | 5 +++--
 src/copy-file-data.c | 5 +++--
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
index 2802c0c7b..fa14e7a2c 100644
--- a/NEWS
+++ b/NEWS
@@ -51,8 +51,9 @@ GNU coreutils NEWS                                    -*- outline -*-
 ** Changes in behavior
 
   'cp' with default options may again, like with versions before v9.8,
-  miss opportunities to create holes with file systems like squashfs,
-  that support SEEK_HOLE only trivially.
+  miss opportunities to create holes with file systems that support
+  SEEK_HOLE only trivially.  This change is a consequence of the
+  abovementioned copy offload fix.
 
   'sort --compress-program' will continue without compressing temporary files
   if the specified program cannot be executed.  Also malformed shell scripts
diff --git a/src/copy-file-data.c b/src/copy-file-data.c
index c46b7edc5..125cf7856 100644
--- a/src/copy-file-data.c
+++ b/src/copy-file-data.c
@@ -480,8 +480,9 @@ infer_scantype (int fd, struct stat const *sb, off_t pos,
             return LSEEK_SCANTYPE;
 
           /* Though the file may have holes, SEEK_DATA and SEEK_HOLE
-             didn't find any.  This can happen with file systems like
-             circa-2025 squashfs that support SEEK_HOLE only trivially.
+             didn't find any.  This can happen with file systems
+             that support SEEK_HOLE only trivially,
+             such as squashfs in Linux kernel 6.17 and earlier.
              This can also happen due to transparent file compression,
              which can also indicate fewer than the usual number of blocks.  */
 
-- 
2.51.0

Reply via email to