Le ven. 17 avr. 2026 à 19:24, Paul Eggert <[email protected]> a écrit :
>
> On 2026-04-17 10:20, Laurent Lyaudet wrote:
> >> Not a fair comparison. The fair comparison is:
> >>
> >> lines=$(wc -ln "$file")
> >>
> >> versus:
> >>
> >> lines=$(wc -l <"$file")
> >>
> > Still not a fair comparison.
>
> Sure it is, in the context of your earlier example.
>
> > A fair comparison can be:
> >>>> for file in "${files[@]}"; do
> >>>> lines=$(wc -l <"$file") &&
> >>>> printf '"%s" contains %d lines\n' "$file" $lines
> >>>> done
> > versus:
> > lines=$(wc -ln -- "${files[@]}")
>
> Those are not equivalent, so it's not a fair comparison.
>
> At this point I'll let you have the last word; we're not making progress.
Ok, if I can have the last word.
Is that equivalent?:
lines=""
for file in "${files[@]}"; do
lines+=$(wc -l <"$file")
lines+=$'\n'
done
> versus:
lines=$(wc -ln --total=never -- "${files[@]}")
And that?:
declare -i total=0
lines=""
lines_current=0
for file in "${files[@]}"; do
lines_current=$(wc -l <"$file")
lines+="${lines_current}"
lines+=$'\n'
((total+=lines_current))
done
lines+="${total}"
lines+=$'\n'
> versus:
lines=$(wc -ln -- "${files[@]}")
