On Tue, May 02, 2000 at 09:21:32AM -0600, Derek Scherger wrote:
> I noticed after the y2k rollover that CVS dates had year <= 99 and then
> year >= 2000 which seemed kinda strange. I haven't checked but this
> might have been fixed in one of the 1.10.x releases.
This was an often used method to remedy y2k problems, since it preserves
compatibility with older software versions, but also offers safety for
the future.
Regards,
Matthias
--
Matthias Kranz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.belug.org/~kranz
"Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again.
Fail again. Fail better." (Samuel Beckett)
