Mark D. Baushke wrote: > What [connection method] option name do you suggest? :ext;sign=yes: ?
How about `SignCommits', with =(yes|no) becoming optional? > I don't know if the GPG name needs to be present or not. Folks could use > PGP or GPG or any other OpenPGP conformant program to get the job done, > couldn't they? Yes. Good point. > I'm not sure that verify makes sense as an administrator may want to do > this kind of checking in a commitinfo trigger and base it on the web of > trust for a given key rather just saying it was signed... Another good point, and it will save work and make things easier to customize at the same time. RequireCommitSignatures=(yes|no) it is. Thanks, Derek -- Derek R. Price CVS Solutions Architect Ximbiot <http://ximbiot.com> v: +1 717.579.6168 f: +1 717.234.3125 <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Bug-cvs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs
