On Tuesday 15 November 2005 04:49, Larry Jones wrote: > Rahul Bhargava writes: > > Sounds like a good idea. > > Looks like I'm in the minority. Go for it, Derek.
I assume this will in the same way affect the output of '-n update'? If so, please consider that this will cause compatibility issues with cvs frontends ... The U/P in this case provides some extra information: U: new file P: file already there but new revision Regards Frank _______________________________________________ Bug-cvs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs
