Frank Hemer writes: > > I assume this will in the same way affect the output of '-n update'? > > If so, please consider that this will cause compatibility issues with cvs > frontends ...
No, it won't. > The U/P in this case provides some extra information: > U: new file > P: file already there but new revision That is not correct -- the server is always at liberty to do a regular update rather than a patch. The current code compares the size of the patch and the size of the actual file and sends whichever is smaller. -Larry Jones I always send Grandma a thank-you note right away. ...Ever since she sent me that empty box with the sarcastic note saying she was just checking to see if the Postal Service was still working. -- Calvin _______________________________________________ Bug-cvs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs
