-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Yves Dorfsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is CVS development still active ? Yes. > Will we ever see 1.12 make it to stable ? Yes. See URL: https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?func=detailitem&item_id=4686 for the list of dependencies. > What does it take to get a patch included in the three. s/three./tree?/ Test cases and general agreement that the patch is needed. > I hit a problem with PAM/ldap on Solaris, and ended using this patch > to solve it: > > http://savannah.nongnu.org/patch/?func=detailitem&item_id=4488 Yup. I believe Brian Murphy took care of that on 2005-10-16 in the FEATURE branch which was almost two weeks after 1.12.13 was released. Brian? If you applied #4488 to the FEATURE branch, could you please close the bug? > But I was wondering the chances of it to make it to the trunk, and the > likely timeline. I believe it is already present... (at least the part that made sense). I am not sure if the 'pam_set_item (pamh, PAM_RUSER, pam_username);' code was used or not. You may checkout your own copy of the cvs 1.12.13.1 top-of-tree sources Check out the 'CVS' link on the https://savannah.nongnu.org/cvs/?group=cvs page. Enjoy! -- Mark -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEZBxECg7APGsDnFERAqiXAJ4scHHMXRBCmBzXBAnmXS3ZYSesXACglS0q Wkmqb2nNmmGw5bmPC/QteW0= =kLyB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Bug-cvs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs
