Mark D. Baushke wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Yves Dorfsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Is CVS development still active ?
Yes.
Will we ever see 1.12 make it to stable ?
Yes. See URL:
https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?func=detailitem&item_id=4686
for the list of dependencies.
What does it take to get a patch included in the three.
s/three./tree?/
Test cases and general agreement that the patch is needed.
I hit a problem with PAM/ldap on Solaris, and ended using this patch
to solve it:
http://savannah.nongnu.org/patch/?func=detailitem&item_id=4488
Yup. I believe Brian Murphy took care of that on 2005-10-16 in the
FEATURE branch which was almost two weeks after 1.12.13 was released.
Brian? If you applied #4488 to the FEATURE branch, could you please
close the bug?
But I was wondering the chances of it to make it to the trunk, and the
likely timeline.
I believe it is already present... (at least the part that made sense).
I am not sure if the 'pam_set_item (pamh, PAM_RUSER, pam_username);' code
was used or not.
You may checkout your own copy of the cvs 1.12.13.1 top-of-tree sources
Check out the 'CVS' link on the https://savannah.nongnu.org/cvs/?group=cvs
page.
It was reported as a bug here:
http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/index.php?func=detailitem&item_id=14721
and as a patch. Not knowing how the patch section should work I just let
it alone
in case it was useful to someone. How *should* it be used?
As you can see a patch has been committed to the feature branch and should
work without further changes.
/Brian
_______________________________________________
Bug-cvs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs
