> Am 21.06.2025 um 00:05 schrieb Paul Eggert <egg...@cs.ucla.edu>:
>
> On 2025-06-20 03:01, Peter Dyballa wrote:
>> To me "char const *const *" is not the same as "char const *" – could be for
>> PPC Mac OS X 10.4.11 too? I do not understand these code differences anyway.
>
> Correct. Read the types right to left. The former is a pointer to a constant
> pointer to a constant char. The latter is a pointer to a constant char. If
> you have an expression P of the former type, then *P has the latter type.
And that's alright? Because print_context_label() only uses parts of the name
or names struct? Or a different view…
--
Greetings
Pete
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new
discoveries, is not "Eureka!" (I found it!) but "That's funny..."
– Isaac Asimov
