On 2025-06-21 00:52, Peter Dyballa wrote:
Am 21.06.2025 um 00:05 schrieb Paul Eggert<egg...@cs.ucla.edu>:
On 2025-06-20 03:01, Peter Dyballa wrote:
To me "char const *const *" is not the same as "char const *" – could be for
PPC Mac OS X 10.4.11 too? I do not understand these code differences anyway.
Correct. Read the types right to left. The former is a pointer to a constant
pointer to a constant char. The latter is a pointer to a constant char. If you
have an expression P of the former type, then *P has the latter type.
And that's alright?
I expect it's intended, yes. I haven't looked at it carefully recently.
