On 8/22/07, Bob Proulx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > With that caveat, would it be enough to use the same escapes that 'ls -b' > uses and accept that into the strings? That would make it easier to > cut and paste the result into the configuration file. It would also > allow keeping basically the same design as currently exists.
Ick :) I'd prefer to avoid using escapes at all...
