> From: Bernhard Voelker <m...@bernhard-voelker.de>, sent: Sunday, January 26, > 2025 6:26 PM > On 1/24/25 16:03, Dietmar Hahn (Fujitsu) via Bug reports for the GNU find > utilities wrote: > >> From: Bernhard Voelker <m...@bernhard-voelker.de, sent: Thursday, > January 23, 2025 10:49 PM: > >>> The fts_cycle looks corrupted. > >> > >> The underlying gnulib code seems to be a bit vague about this, > >> and the comment about coreutils is also not true (any more): > >> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gnulib.git/tree/lib/fts-cycle.c#n110 > >> > >> /* FIXME: setting fts_cycle like this isn't proper. > >> To do what the documentation requires, we'd have to > >> go around the cycle again and find the right entry. > >> But no callers in coreutils use the fts_cycle member. */ > >> ent->fts_cycle = ent; > >> ent->fts_info = FTS_DC; > > Also coreutils as gnulib FTS user doesn't show the fts_cycle information > in the error diagnostics. > > I pushed the following to avoid de-referencing fts_cycle in find(1) as well: > > https://git.sv.gnu.org/cgit/findutils.git/commit/?id=e5d6eb919b9 > > I couldn't reproduce the issue here, so maybe you could check?
Yes, but couldn't reproduce. > Thanks again for reporting the issue. Many thanks for your work! Dietmar. > Have a nice day, > Berny
