On Mon, 04 Jul 2005 21:56:29 +0900, Shigio Yamaguchi wrote... > By the way, I began to feel the doubt in the current implementation > using plug-in parser again. If only giving up plug-in parser, we can > make simpler, more efficient gtags without any external commands. > I will make another proposal later, it is a story in the future though.
Would you add built-in parser to plans.html, in order to clarify the priority of built-in parser? I think that the first purpose of using built-in parser is reducing reading GTAGS from defined(). Is this right? ---- Hideki IWAMOTO [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Bug-global mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-global
