> Would you add built-in parser to plans.html, in order to clarify > the priority of built-in parser?
OK. I have added the plan at the tail of the list. > I think that the first purpose of using built-in parser is reducing > reading GTAGS from defined(). Is this right? No, it is not only that. I would like to make gtags simpler. I will write the proposal for it in near future. -- Shigio YAMAGUCHI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Tama Communications Corporation PGP fingerprint: D1CB 0B89 B346 4AB6 5663 C4B6 3CA5 BBB3 57BE DDA3 _______________________________________________ Bug-global mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-global
