Thank you for reply. I understand that rewriting parser by flex is more important issue on the project than typical change. I think so, too.
Now I try to modify the source code in order to ignore 'extern "C"' sentence like namespace token. If I do it, can I send a patch of it to you? Regards, Shigio YAMAGUCHI-2 wrote: > > On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 03:00:19 -0700 (PDT) > Hirohito Kato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hello, > Hello, > >> I have a question of this issue. >> Is this problem difficult to be fixed? >> >> Though the priority of it seems to be very low, I would like to know >> why the problem isn't fixed for a long time. >> (It is important problem for me...) >> >> I appreciate it if you could answer my question. > > I cannot promise to fix the problem right now. I rather would like to > rewrite the C++ parser using flex, because the current parser is hard > to maintain. But I couldn't secure enough time for it. :< > > However, you need not wait for it; you can fix the problem by yourself. > If you fix it, would you please post it to this mailing list? > > I understood the importance of C++ by your mail. > Thank you. > > > _______________________________________________ > Bug-global mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-global > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/GNU-GLOBAL-skips-indexing-of-inline-functions-in-files-having-C%2B%2B-support-macros-tp11539370p20339614.html Sent from the Gnu - Global - Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Bug-global mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-global
