> However I'm surprised that git is not suitable for porting from CVS. > Yesterday I have ported the repository to git using: > git cvsimport -C global-git global > > It took about an hour, but there were no errors and it seems everything > went fine. Maybe you should give it a try?
It was lack of my explanation. I'd like to make sure that CVS users won't suffer from change of syntax of the command line. So, there is also a possibility that Subversion is adopted. Regards Shigio 2015-02-18 19:32 GMT+09:00 rchmielarz . <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > It's good to hear that. > > However I'm surprised that git is not suitable for porting from CVS. > Yesterday I have ported the repository to git using: > git cvsimport -C global-git global > > It took about an hour, but there were no errors and it seems everything > went fine. Maybe you should give it a try? > > Cheers, > Radek > > 2015-02-17 23:24 GMT+01:00 Shigio YAMAGUCHI <[email protected]>: > >> Hi, >> > I wanted to ask if there is a plan to move from CVS to a more modern >> > version control system like git? Quite recently emacs has moved to >> > it and although it was quite painful it succeeded in the end. >> >> I'm investigating about this. >> >> The most important point is to reduce obstacles of the shift. >> Subversion has consideration to CVS user, and Mercurial has consideration >> to Subversion user. As the result, I'm thinking Mercurial is best up to >> now. >> >> Regards, >> Shigio >> >> >> 2015-02-17 5:12 GMT+09:00 rchmielarz . <[email protected]>: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I wanted to ask if there is a plan to move from CVS to a more modern >>> version control system like git? Quite recently emacs has moved to it and >>> although it was quite painful it succeeded in the end. >>> >>> I'm asking because a couple of weeks ago I started using global and I >>> wanted to add native support for TTCN to global instead of using it through >>> ctags which means I can't look for function and symbol references. >>> >>> I looked on the website then and when I saw that the project is still >>> using CVS I thought that it's probably dead and I should look elsewhere. >>> But fortunately glancing at the mailing list it seems it is still alive. >>> Still, the feeling of a project being dormant prevails so maybe the move to >>> git would give it a nice stir. >>> >>> What do you think? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Radek >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Bug-global mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-global >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Shigio YAMAGUCHI <[email protected]> >> PGP fingerprint: D1CB 0B89 B346 4AB6 5663 C4B6 3CA5 BBB3 57BE DDA3 >> > > -- Shigio YAMAGUCHI <[email protected]> PGP fingerprint: D1CB 0B89 B346 4AB6 5663 C4B6 3CA5 BBB3 57BE DDA3
_______________________________________________ Bug-global mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-global
