Hello, > I'm navigating through https://github.com/openrisc/llvm-or1k ... > Fist and third results are incorrect. They are declarations of these functions and not the callers.
Could you show the source code in which the problem has occurred? This mailing list is recorded in the archive. But we won't know whether or not the external site exists tomorrow. > Output also doesn't seem to show what method calls a searched method. > Note: <<releaseSucc>> releaseSucc(SU, *I); It would be nice to have something like > <<ScheduleDAGVLIW::releaseSuccessors(SUnit *SU)>> releaseSucc(SU, *I) That's the present specification. In cscope, ':cs f c' is 'Find functions calling this function:'. But in gtags-cscope, it is 'Find locations calling this function:'. Regards, Shigio 2015-09-25 3:38 GMT+09:00 rail shafigulin <[email protected]>: > I'm navigating through https://github.com/openrisc/llvm-or1k > > I've connected the GTAGS database to my Vim using > :cs add GTAGS > and set my cscope program to gtags-cscope using > :set cscopeprg=gtags-cscope > just like it is stated in the manual. > > I've tried to do a caller search for releaseSucc using the following > command > :cs f c releaseSucc > > The output looked like the following: > > llvm-or1k/include/llvm/CodeGen/MachineScheduler.h|335| <<releaseSucc>> > void releaseSucc(SUnit *SU, SDep *SuccEdge); > llvm-or1k/lib/CodeGen/MachineScheduler.cpp|539| <<releaseSucc>> > releaseSucc(SU, &*I); > llvm-or1k/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/ScheduleDAGVLIW.cpp|86| <<releaseSucc>> > void releaseSucc(SUnit *SU, const SDep &D); > llvm-or1k/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/ScheduleDAGVLIW.cpp|146| > <<releaseSucc>> releaseSucc(SU, *I); > > Fist and third results are incorrect. They are declarations of these > functions and not the callers. > > Output also doesn't seem to show what method calls a searched method. > Note: <<releaseSucc>> releaseSucc(SU, *I); It would be nice to have > something like <<ScheduleDAGVLIW::releaseSuccessors(SUnit *SU)>> > releaseSucc(SU, *I) > > > As an additional note: > It would be nice to give the global tool awareness what function callers > are being search for. The result above demonstrates that search found two > methods named releaseSucc, one from ScheduleDAGMI class (2nd result) and > one from ScheduleDAGVLIW class (4th result). If a user could pass > information to the global tool stating that the user is looking for callers > of ScheduleDAGVLIW::rereleaseSucc(...) instead of a caller of <any > class>::releaseSucc(...), I believe this would be a very good improvement > of the tool. > > > _______________________________________________ > Bug-global mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-global > > -- Shigio YAMAGUCHI <[email protected]> PGP fingerprint: D1CB 0B89 B346 4AB6 5663 C4B6 3CA5 BBB3 57BE DDA3
_______________________________________________ Bug-global mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-global
