OK. This change will probably be in the next release.
I think there was a mistake in the specifications.

Thanks,
Shigio

2020年4月24日(金) 15:56 Marcus Harnisch <marcus.harni...@verilab.com>:
>
> Hi Shigio
>
> That would definitely be a good thing to have (including the corresponding 
> short options). In my case an additional options filter will still be 
> necessary so that --single-update won't trigger rebuilding the file list.
>
> Thanks,
> Marcus
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 3:40 AM Shigio YAMAGUCHI <shi...@gnu.org> wrote:
>>
>> > Something (perhaps gtags-mode) calls gtags with the --config option before
>> > the actual scan. This in turn invokes gtags_hook, too.
>> > I am already maintaining a list of options in my gtags_hook that should 
>> > bypass
>> > generating the file list, e.g --help, --dump, --single-update. Now adding 
>> > --config.
>>
>> I understood.
>> How about skipping the hook when the following options are specified?
>> These are informational options only.
>>
>>         --help, --dump, --config, --version
>>
>> If there is no objection, I will make that change.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Shigio
>>
>> 2020年4月23日(木) 23:35 Marcus Harnisch <marcus.harni...@verilab.com>:
>> >
>> > Still investigating... It looks like the issue isn't caused by the actual 
>> > gtags invocation. Something (perhaps gtags-mode) calls gtags with the 
>> > --config option before the actual scan. This in turn invokes gtags_hook, 
>> > too. I am already maintaining a list of options in my gtags_hook that 
>> > should bypass generating the file list, e.g --help, --dump, 
>> > --single-update. Now adding --config.
>> > Let's close this for now.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Marcus
>> >
>> > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 11:22 PM Shigio YAMAGUCHI <shi...@gnu.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hello,
>> >> Could you please give me a reproduce method to understand the problem?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Shigio
>> >>
>> >> 2020年4月21日(火) 22:26 Marcus Harnisch <marcus.harni...@verilab.com>:
>> >> >
>> >> > Hi Shigio
>> >> >
>> >> > It's been a while but related to this, I was wondering if 
>> >> > GTAGS_COMMANDLINE isn't supposed to include ‘--single-update’ when 
>> >> > specified. In my hook script, I am using this to determine whether to 
>> >> > start a long-running process of rebuilding the file list.
>> >> > It looks like the switch doesn't make it into GTAGS_COMMANDLINE. Did 
>> >> > this change in one of the recent releases? Could this be impacted by 
>> >> > something in the config file? I am almost certain that it used to work 
>> >> > the way I expected.
>> >> > $ global -u --single-update foo/bar
>> >> > GTAGS_COMMANDLINE=gtags --skip-unreadable --sqlite --compact 
>> >> > --config=ctagscom
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks,
>> >> > Marcus
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Shigio YAMAGUCHI <shi...@gnu.org>
>> >> PGP fingerprint:
>> >> 26F6 31B4 3D62 4A92 7E6F  1C33 969C 3BE3 89DD A6EB
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Shigio YAMAGUCHI <shi...@gnu.org>
>> PGP fingerprint:
>> 26F6 31B4 3D62 4A92 7E6F  1C33 969C 3BE3 89DD A6EB



-- 
Shigio YAMAGUCHI <shi...@gnu.org>
PGP fingerprint:
26F6 31B4 3D62 4A92 7E6F  1C33 969C 3BE3 89DD A6EB

Reply via email to