> one worthwhile addition that we know to work but was not >implemented in the 1+0 ply evaluation, which has the same >computational cost as 1 ply but is better. (some like to cal it 0.5 >ply, some 1.5 ply, but neither name make sense to me) .basically it is >simply averaging the 0 and 1 ply equities (i think the best weights >were .6 something).
Just curious, can somebody breifly explain the origin of the odd-even effect ? I've often heard people saying "oh, that's normal" about it, but I haven't yet found an explanation. MaX. _______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
