Am up to 20 games with the same results.
Peter
Paul Hankin wrote:
On 1 Sep 2006, at 21:30, Peter Carlson wrote:
Ran an interesting test. Gnu windows versus
Gnu cli. Both use the same settings file, both I assume, use the same
neuro net and libraries.
Test:
Ran gnu windows. Set player 0 to gnu with same eval as the eval
settings
Before and after each roll, copied matchid and postionid and pasted
into the cli
requested a hint on the doubling and a hint 3 for the next moves
Played the moves given back as a hint by the cli in the windows game.
Outcome:
gnu windows beat the cli 16 to 5 over 10 games.
Question:
Why? Is there something obvious I am missing here? Is there a way to
make this be more even so the results would be closer to 50/50.
This isn't an interesting test; 10 games is far too few to show any
difference in skill between the two versions.
If you want closer results, play more matches.
--Paul Hankin
_______________________________________________
Bug-gnubg mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
--This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by
MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
|
_______________________________________________
Bug-gnubg mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
