On 12/14/06, Christian Anthon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(...)
Almost a third of 0ply's doubles are considered early and the ratio (early doubles):(missed double takes) is 10:1. The cube action of 0ply is still excellent though. Perhaps all this is just a manifestation of gnubg 0ply overestimating the equity of the player on roll, but I still found it interesting.
I thought it had to do with a poor volatility estimation, rather than a problem with the absolute equity. 2-ply "sees" the real volatility; it seems like 0-ply on average overestimates this volatilty by quite a bit. Maybe this could actually be improved quite easily? Of course the question is if you change 0-ply cube behaviour, how will it affect 2-ply cube behaviour? -- Robert-Jan Veldhuizen
_______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
