Massimiliano Maini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On the other hand, export to RTF (which seems to be an open format, as > far as I can see) sounds like a good idea, but I don't know how much > effort this will take (and for sure there are more urgent things to do).
RTF is "open" in the sense that there's some documentation for it, but about all that people use it for is import and export from Word and as such it's mostly governed by weird Word quirks. It's a lot less open in practice in my experience than just about anything shy of full-out proprietary formats. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> _______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
