Hi Achim, I guess you lostpasr of Bob's message ... what are 1D, 2C, 2D ? Can you repost Bob's original message ?
MaX. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/08/2008 13:13:38: > Hi folks, > > I'm forwarding an e-mail by Bob Koca (he also tried to show me this > behavior of gnubg whwn we met in Monte Calro): > > *************************************************** > Here is a summary of some of the weird behavior I?ve noticed when > doing rollouts involving noise. I suspect it may just be an issue of > something being done in a wrong order. I used a 1 point match, zero > skill position so the weakening of either player and the clicking of > cubeful on or off should not matter but it does. It is the latest > build which I just downloaded today. > > In particular: > > Comparing 1A to 1C shows that if cubeful is on then weakening one > player can influence the result. > > Comparing 2C to 2D shows that if cubeful is off then determinsitc or > nondeterministic noise makes a difference. However this is not the > case if cubeful is on as can be seen from comparing 1C to 1D. > > On a related issue it would be nice for the rollout results to give > more data. For example > > Whether the databases were being used, what type of noise was used, > what MEQ was used. Basically every setting that is alterable seems > like it should be included in the summary. > > Thanks for any help, Bob Koca > > Player 1 = bobk Orange checkers on bottom > Player 0 = gnubg White checkers on top > > Rollout of 15 on ace vs. 15 on ace 1 point match with various settings: > > All use no variance reduction, 1296 trials, quasi random dice, no > bearoff database, player 0 on roll, and seed = 1,000,000 > > 1) Using CUBEFUL ON > A) expert with cubeful eval checked vs expert with cubeful eval checked > win% of .658951 and s.d of .013173 > B) expert with cubeful eval off vs expert with cubeful eval off > > same as A > > C) advanced (.015 det noise and cubeful eval) vs expert > win % of .592607 and s.d of .011854 > *************************************************** > > Ciao > > Achim > > > > _______________________________________________ > Bug-gnubg mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
_______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
