Hmm ... I may agree for take/drops: if you're playing gnubg and he has 
doubled, he knows
the equities for no double and double/take, hence the analysis is already 
done (this
under the assumption that gnubg playing level is the same as the analysis 
level, e.g.
both at World Class, otherwise this won't be correct).

But I'm not sure about luck: luck would require analysis (at the specified 
level).
Is this really done on the fly ? I thought it was done only during 
analysis ...

MaX.

[email protected] wrote on 
04/05/2009 23:31:10:

>  I guess I didn't read your message too carefully the first time. 
> Take/drops (and Luck I believe) are analysed as you go along when 
> playing a computer opponent. Probably wasn't marked in previous 
> versions. It doesn't take much if any time. Confusing, possibly. 
> Desired, unknown.
> 
> Christian.

> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 11:18 PM, Zulli, Louis P <[email protected]> 
wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I moved away my gnubgautorc. It still happened when I accepted a 
> double in this position: u90GAALzPQ8AAA:AgEAAIABAAAA
> 
> Louis
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Christian Anthon" <[email protected]>
> To: "Louis P Zulli" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "bug-gnubg" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, May 4, 2009 4:58:30 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: Re: New gnubg oddity?
> 
> I'm not really sure why or when this would happen. Can you tell me 
> if this happens with a clean gnubgautorc file, when the problem 
appeared, etc.
> 
> Christian. 

> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 9:54 PM, Zulli, Louis P <[email protected]> 
wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I built from the 20090502 snapshot. I'm seeing a behavior that I 
> don't recall seeing before. gnubg is putting analysis highlighting 
> and ?? on certain plays in the game record as they occur. For 
> example, if I take a double and gnubg deems my decision "very bad," 
> the move appears with ?? and highlighted in yellow. This happens 
> during the game, before I request any analysis. "Very lucky" rolls 
> also appear in bold face as they occur.
> 
> Is this new? Is anyone else seeing this?
> 
> Louis
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-gnubg mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
_______________________________________________
Bug-gnubg mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg

Reply via email to