Here are all the possibilities for a 3,1 from the initial position. I am worried that 8-5 6-5 sneaks at number 6
score gnubg id position 8.00384996831 4HPwATDgc/ABIQ (0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, -5, 0, -3, 0, 0, 0, 5, -5, 0, 0, 0, 3, 0, 5, 0, 0, 0, 0, -2, 0) 7.83777993917 4HPwATDEc/ABKA (0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, -5, 0, -3, 0, 0, 0, 5, -5, 0, 0, 0, 3, 0, 4, 0, 0, 1, 0, -2, 0) 7.81063996255 4HPwATDgc/ABEg (0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, -5, 0, -3, 0, 0, 0, 5, -5, 0, 0, 0, 3, 0, 5, 0, 0, 0, 0, -2, 0) 7.75730997324 4HPwATDgc+IBKA (0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, -5, 0, -3, 0, 0, 0, 4, -5, 0, 1, 0, 3, 0, 5, 0, 0, 0, 0, -2, 0) 7.43968993425 4HPwATDQZ/ABKA (0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, -5, 0, -3, 0, 0, 0, 5, -5, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 5, 1, 0, 0, 0, -2, 0) 6.84054994583 4HPwATCwZ/ABMA (0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, -5, 0, -3, 0, 0, 0, 5, -5, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 4, 2, 0, 0, 0, -2, 0) 6.81688992679 4HPwATDga/ABIg (0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, -5, 0, -3, 0, 0, 0, 5, -5, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 5, 0, 0, 0, 0, -2, 0) 6.67967991531 4HPwATDQc/ABIg (0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, -5, 0, -3, 0, 0, 0, 5, -5, 0, 0, 0, 3, 0, 4, 1, 0, 0, 0, -2, 0) 6.67962995172 4HPwATDCc/ABMA (0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, -5, 0, -3, 0, 0, 0, 5, -5, 0, 0, 0, 3, 0, 4, 0, 0, 0, 1, -2, 0) 6.24834996462 4HPwATDIZ/ABMA (0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, -5, 0, -3, 0, 0, 0, 5, -5, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 5, 0, 1, 0, 0, -2, 0) 6.10885995626 4HPwATDgc+EBMA (0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, -5, 0, -3, 0, 0, 0, 4, -5, 0, 0, 1, 3, 0, 5, 0, 0, 0, 0, -2, 0) 4.3719098568 4HPwATDEa/ABMA (0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, -5, 0, -3, 0, 0, 0, 5, -5, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 4, 0, 0, 1, 0, -2, 0) 4.29143989086 4HPwATDga+IBMA (0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, -5, 0, -3, 0, 0, 0, 4, -5, 0, 1, 0, 2, 1, 5, 0, 0, 0, 0, -2, 0) 4.23469984531 4HPwATCkc/ABMA (0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, -5, 0, -3, 0, 0, 0, 5, -5, 0, 0, 0, 3, 0, 3, 1, 0, 1, 0, -2, 0) 4.15422987938 4HPwATDQc+IBMA (0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, -5, 0, -3, 0, 0, 0, 4, -5, 0, 1, 0, 3, 0, 4, 1, 0, 0, 0, -2, 0) 3.22565984726 4HPwATDQV/ABMA (0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, -5, 0, -3, 0, 0, 0, 5, -5, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 5, 1, 0, 0, 0, -2, 0) On 20 January 2012 03:45, Mark Higgins <[email protected]> wrote: > :) I'll give it a try and check the couple games you sent. > > > On Jan 19, 2012, at 9:39 AM, Joseph Heled wrote: > >> I was asking for help, not for more work. >> >> For example, anyone who implemented play against pubeval can check a >> few of the moves I sent. >> >> -Joseph >> >> On 20 January 2012 03:35, Mark Higgins <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I used the following post to define pubeval; is this the proper definition >>> still: >>> >>> http://www.bkgm.com/rgb/rgb.cgi?view+610 >>> >>> ? >>> >>> >>> >>> On Jan 19, 2012, at 8:31 AM, Joseph Heled wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I just run 10000 1 point match games between gnubg and pubeval. I >>>> think this is the most fair, since there are no gammons of cubes >>>> involved. >>>> >>>> However, gnubg won 9840 of those, which makes me think something is wrong. >>>> >>>> Can someone help me verify that pubeval makes the "right" moves? >>>> >>>> I can send a few games in oldmoves format, or can check specific moves. >>>> >>>> I am attaching 2 games as examples. >>>> >>>> -Joseph >>>> <game1.fibs><game2.fibs> >>> > _______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
