Hi Joseph, happy to see you work again on all this :)
Very interesting question you've raised here. XG developer (Xavier Dufaure de Citres) is active on BGonline.com (http://www.bgonline.org/forums/): if you ask your question (gnubg 0ply vs XG 1ply) there, he may be willing to help. MaX. On 20 January 2012 00:18, Joseph Heled <[email protected]> wrote: > Speaking of bot to bot comparisons... > > Anyone knows anything about the "raw" strength of the XG variants? By > raw I mean a the 0-ply equivalent, i.e. without any lookup. > > I guess what I am asking is: how much of XG strength comes from > quality of implementation, and how much from the basic net evaluation? > > -Joseph _______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
