On Sat, 16 Mar 2013, Michael Petch wrote:
It might be an interesting experiment to run the Depreli positions
through the new version to see how they compare with XG2 and the
previous version of GNUBG.
I did this at some point with the first 300 positions, but by hand it is
an extremely tedious work.
If someone is interested, I can provide a file with :
position-id
2 ply choice
3 ply choice
4 ply choice
for the 5000 or so positions.
Looking in the benchmark file as a text file and entering the results in a
spreadsheet, I think I was doing about 100/hour... Someone with an XML
editor/viewer should be a little faster.
_______________________________________________
Bug-gnubg mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
