On 2013-03-17 13:11, Philippe Michel wrote: > On Sat, 16 Mar 2013, Michael Petch wrote: > >> It might be an interesting experiment to run the Depreli positions >> through the new version to see how they compare with XG2 and the >> previous version of GNUBG. > > I did this at some point with the first 300 positions, but by hand it is > an extremely tedious work. > > If someone is interested, I can provide a file with : > > position-id > 2 ply choice > 3 ply choice > 4 ply choice > > for the 5000 or so positions. > > Looking in the benchmark file as a text file and entering the results in a > spreadsheet, I think I was doing about 100/hour... Someone with an XML > editor/viewer should be a little faster. >
I wrote some test code long ago in python to parse the original Depreli XML files (rather trivial). I could revisit that project again if I had some time and automate it. -- Michael Petch CApp::Sysware Consulting Ltd. OpenPGP FingerPrint=D81C 6A0D 987E 7DA5 3219 6715 466A 2ACE 5CAE 3304 _______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
