On 05/08/2013 10:56 AM, Russ Allbery wrote: > At a guess, alpha.gnu.org, where it's still the current version, and > which is linked from <http://www.gnu.org/software/gnubg/>.
That is one possibility, but there were some others which is why I asked. What had me curious was that they were using Fedora Core which does use a more recent version(source) of GNUBG. > I'm not sure whether it would be better to just have the FSF folks > remove that directory or whether you want to go through the effort to > get set up to upload new versions to ftp.gnu.org proper. My > recollection is that the setup is a little complicated, but then the > releases would be in the regular GNU mirror network. The www.gnu.org > pages are normally handled via Savannah, which is the GNU Project > Sourceforge-like thing. I am well aware of the procedures. Yes the webpages are updates via Savannah. The movement from one FTP site to another (@ gnu.org) is a manual procedure. When I released the first 1.0 release the GNU Project contacted me asking if I wished to be an official maintainer. One of my questions back was related to movement off the alpha ftp server. As time permits I will do it. Thanks, -- Michael Petch GNU Backgammon Maintainer / Developer OpenPGP FingerPrint=D81C 6A0D 987E 7DA5 3219 6715 466A 2ACE 5CAE 3304 _______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
